Words that don't exist but should (XV)
If many arcane things constitute arcana, why can't a collection of mundane things be mundana?
« Official: ladybirds are the new squirrels | Main | The ponciest idea ever »
If many arcane things constitute arcana, why can't a collection of mundane things be mundana?
Right - action needs to be taken!
World domination beckons, Harlequin ladybird style.
With your permission, I'm gonna talk to my web-designer amigo about you know what.
Will report back shortly.
Posted by: 100 Words | 01 March 2008 at 11:26 AM
How about Lexiconcoction.com?
Bit of a mouthful, praps?
Posted by: 100 Words | 01 March 2008 at 11:32 AM
Permission very much granted. Lexiconconction does sound a bit much. but I like the lexi- root.
Or perhaps something around neologism?
Will ponder.
Posted by: rafael | 01 March 2008 at 04:50 PM
perhaps it's a lexican't
Posted by: rivergirlie | 06 March 2008 at 06:34 PM
repeating :)
Raf, please me some phone number to call you.
looking forward etc. etc.
thank you
Posted by: Vlad Orsher | 12 March 2008 at 01:05 PM
oops. "please send me" of course.
Posted by: Vlad Orsher | 12 March 2008 at 01:10 PM
Have we had any progress on this? I have "words" for the site burning a hole in my brain...
Posted by: Marie Phillips | 23 March 2008 at 07:36 PM
We are, Marie. Meantime, write them down.
Posted by: 100 Words | 03 April 2008 at 03:37 PM